The use of alternative silvicultural practices to protect ecological integrity and biodiversity is a critical component of forest management in British Columbia. Retention of trees along riparian corridors has been identified as an important management practice (Blinn & Kilgore 2001; Swanson & Franklin 1992). While this management practice was implemented largely to protect in-stream water quality and habitat, the importance of riparian buffer strips for terrestrial biota is being increasingly recognized (Cockle & Richardson 2003; Hibbs & Bower 2001; Pearson & Manuwal 2001). Riparian forests often contain disproportionately species rich plant communities compared to adjacent uplands, leading to the conclusion that these habitats are important for regional biodiversity (Naiman & Decamps 1997). Furthermore, retained aggregates of trees (riparian or upland) within harvested areas have been hypothesized to act as source areas for recolonization of surrounding harvested areas during stand regeneration (Franklin et al. 1997). The majority of work addressing the effectiveness of buffer strips in protecting terrestrial biota has focused on vertebrates (Cockle & Richardson 2003; Darveau et al. 1995; Vesely & McComb 2002) with riparian vegetation largely ignored (see however Hylander et al. 2005; Hylander et al. 2002; Stewart & Mallik 2006). The appropriate width of effective buffer strips is also widely debated and little is understood regarding the contribution of buffer strips to forest health including the reassembly of communities in the adjacent upland harvested areas. Within riparian areas, ground layer vegetation plays critical roles in water retention, erosion control and nutrient cycling (see review in Naiman & Decamps 1997). The purpose of this proposal is to evaluate the importance of riparian buffer strips of different widths in sustaining ground layer vegetation, including plants with cultural significance for the Secwepemc community. Vegetation (defined here as the herbaceous vascular plants and bryophytes on forest floor, boulder, tree base, and decaying log substrates) diversity will be sampled to obtain quantitative data on species composition as well as functional group (e.g. N-fixers, substrate-specific bryophytes) and culturally significant plant representation as a gauge of the ecological value of buffer strips. Bryophytes and vascular plants are important to include as they often show differential response to ecosystem perturbation (Hakan & Jonsson 2001). As vascular plants are rooted in the soil, their response may be predicated more on soil chemistry and moisture, while bryophyte response is often dictated by substrate availability and microclimate (Hakan & Jonsson 2001). Recognition of the cultural significance of plants in this study will allow us to partner our research findings with Secwepemc cultural knowledge, as well as historical and ongoing use of plants and their ecologies, to better inform forest management. In addition to the strong focus on characterizing the physical and biological properties of buffer strips in the field, this research will have a strong analytical focus on developing and testing quantitative diversity indices to help in the operational planning and monitoring of buffer strips. While ground vegetation is often used as a potential indicator of ecosystem change (Fenton et al. 2003; Gehlhausen et al. 2000), differential responses may be expected from taxonomic and functional groups found within the ground layer. Our proposal makes an important contribution to an integrated understanding of the role of riparian buffer strips for sustaining biodiversity across multiple taxonomic and functional groups. Specifically, we will address the following questions: (1) Within riparian habitats, does the presence and/or width of a riparian buffer strip affect the diversity and abundance of the ground layer vegetation? (2) Within adjacent harvested areas, does the presence and/or width of a bu ...
Baldwin, Lyn. 2008. Structure and functional values of riparian buffer strips for sustaining floristic diversity in interior forested landscapes. Forest Investment Account (FIA) - Forest Science Program. Forest Investment Account Report. FIA2008MR066
Topic: FLNRORD Research Program
Keywords: Forest, Investment, Account, (FIA), British, Columbia
To copy the URL of a document, Right Click on the document title, select "Copy Shortcut/Copy Link", then paste as needed. Only documents available to the public have this feature enabled.