Search Results

1 results returned.
To copy the URL of a document, Right Click on the document title, select "Copy Shortcut/Copy Link", then paste as needed. Only documents available to the public have this feature enabled.
Title Sort descending Sort ascending Primary
Author Sort ascending Sort descending
Date Sort ascending Sort descending
Abstract / Details
Treatment of Repressed Lodgepole Pine Stands Newsome, Teresa A.

Abstract: In 1996, a joint industry-government committee, the Timber Investment Strategy Committee (TISC), made reference to the existing inventory database which listed over 130,000 ha of height repressed lodgepole pine stands in the Cariboo Forest Region (TISC 1996). These stands were in height class 1 (under 10.4 m tall) and in age classes 2, 3 and 4 (21 to 80 years old). Many of these stands are growing at a site index less than 7, and provide minimal contributions to the Annual Allowable Cut (AAC). This poor growth is associated with high densities of pine establishing after wildfires and persisting over time. Height repression in lodgepole pine has previously been studied, with little evidence of response to treatment (e.g., Goudie 1980; Bassman 1985; Keane 1985; Worrall 1995). As part of the Cariboo Timber Investment Strategy, forest licensees and the Ministry of Forests deemed it a high priority to return these forest types to their potential productivity. With the timber fall down that is expected to result from accelerated harvest of mountain pine beetle (MPB) killed stands, there is a critical need to increase forest productivity wherever possible. In addition to the issue of productivity, a significant area occupied by repressed pine stands is located within the ~1.5 million ha range of the northern caribou in the west Chilcotin. This ungulate is blue-listed provincially and threatened nationally. Their principle winter food source is terrestrial lichen which is found growing under older pine canopies and studies have shown that the lichen do not survive well following clearcutting (Miege et al. 2001). Increased rates of harvesting in MPB affected stands have the potential to decrease lichen abundance. Despite the fact that terrestrial lichen is common in repressed pine stands, the Northern Caribou Strategy (Youds et al. 2002) identified these stands as having little value for caribou due to the high stem density acting as a physical barrier to movement. Thinning treatments could facilitate caribou movement through the stands, although the effect of these treatments on lichen species composition and abundance must also be considered. Thinning treatments applied to improve growth of repressed pine stands have the potential to provide caribou habitat, but the effects must be carefully studied. In 1997, an industry/MOFR group was formed to address the Chilcotin repressed pine issue. Two approaches to the management of these stands were identified. The first approach was application of stand tending treatments to existing stands. Not only were these stands very dense but pre-treatment foliar analysis indicated severe nutrient deficiencies, particularly in nitrogen, sulfur and boron. Therefore, the recommended stand tending treatments included a combination of thinning and fertilization. The second approach was site rehabilitation + stand replacement (i.e., removal of the existing repressed pine stand, in some cases followed by site preparation, and then planting lodgepole pine seedlings). Limiting factors for seedling development on these sites include severe climate conditions (dry and cold), cold and sometimes dry soils, nutrient deficiencies, as observed in the existing stands, and vegetation competition from grasses. The first trial established to explore these issues, supported by West Fraser Ltd., was located approximately 80 km west of Williams Lake in the SBPSdc subzone. The 36 year-old pine stand originated from the Rosita Fire (from which the trial is named) and was approximately 3-m tall, with approximately 40,000 stems/ha. The study included both stand replacement and stand tending options. Early results showed that pine were responding positively to stand tending treatments, which in this case consisted of fertilization treatments applied with and without thinning. At about the same time, Farnden and Herrring (2002) were reporting similar findings in another study near Prince George. As a result, partners involv ...
Newsome, Teresa A.. 2007. Treatment of Repressed Lodgepole Pine Stands. Forest Investment Account (FIA) - Forest Science Program. Forest Investment Account Report. FIA2007MR246
Topic: FLNRORD Research Program
Keywords: Forest, Investment, Account, (FIA), Pinus, Contorta, British, Columbia
ISSN:  Scientific Name: 
ISBN:  English Name: 
Other Identifier: 
To copy the URL of a document, Right Click on the document title, select "Copy Shortcut/Copy Link", then paste as needed. Only documents available to the public have this feature enabled.

EIRS Search Options

Useful Contacts